Wednesday, July 22, 2009

What Is A Typica Sorority Initiation Process

Obama Administration prohibits the FBI from testifying about the Sept. 11 Supreme Court filed


response to a lawsuit relatives of the victims of September 11, 2001, the airline companies claimed that the attacks have been successful anyway, much as they strengthen security measures.
According to lawyers for the airlines, is the inaction of the authorities which led to the disastrous outcome of that day. In support of this argument, defense lawyers expressed their intention to obtain the testimony of FBI agents.
In fact, after the attacks, the FBI conducted an extensive investigation. And information obtained during this investigation seem to show that the government took no regulatory actions that day that would have reduced the proportion of the attacks.
However, following intervention by the Attorney General of the United States, Eric Holder, Judge Alvin Hellerstein barred the testimony of FBI agents, thus preventing airlines develop their defense. The hearing will be resumed on 28 July. 8 years after the attacks, a court has been examining the FBI investigation , which includes 155 000 167 000 tests and interrogation records . Its content is not known but through processes of other cases linked [1] and statements by agents to the press. The latter say their research disproves the government's version of events [2].
In flagrant contradiction to statements by CIA officials and successive Secretaries of Justice, the FBI has always refused to attribute the attacks of September 11 to Osama Ben Laden or even is looking for as the author of those facts. ==

[1] For example, during the trial of Zacarias Mousaoui Frenchman accused of conspiring to participate in the Flight 93 hijacking of American Airlines, the FBI rejected the wiretapped conversations that day among airline passengers hostages and their relatives on land. The officials said, under oath, according to the research they conducted, those calls, so often cited, never took place and are false.
[2] "41 responsible anciens états-uniens de l'anti-terrorisme et mettent en cause du renseignement version officielle du 11 Septembre " by Alan Miller, Réseau Voltaire, June 9, 2009.

Tuesday, July 21, 2009

What Size North Face Should I Get

the lawsuit against Aznar

and history has judged and the future will take care of putting in place independent of special interests and corrupt judicial decisions.


Others who once were "gods" are stirred into the grave now seeing are spat upon, trampled upon and reviled by society.


Anyways ... What did we expect? ... THEY make the laws ... and it would be foolish to make laws that were against them. ----------------------------------------------


-------------------------------------------------




The Supreme Court filed the lawsuit against Aznar and the Iraq war

Source: www.20minutos.es



EFE. 20/07/2009




The Criminal Chamber of the Supreme Court has archived lawsuit filed last April by the platform, "Aznar Trial" akin to Communist Party of Spain (PCE) , for Spain's participation in the Iraq war. The complaint was directed against former Prime Minister José María Aznar and the then Ministers of Defence and Foreign Affairs, Federico Trillo and Ana Palacio, respectively, and accused the government of Aznar of having declared war on the sidelines of the established by the Constitution. " In a car, reported on Monday, the Board states that only has jurisdiction over the graduated Trillo and declared inadmissible the complaint admissible against him for not being the facts constituting the offense.




precedentesAdemás Complaints, recalls that in January 2004 filed complaints and allegations made by several thousands of English citizens who demanded Aznar criminal responsibility for participation in the Iraq war.




These were made by the Bar Free Association (ALA), Ezker Batua-Izquierda Unida, the lawyer José Emilio Rodríguez Menéndez, acting general secretary of the Socialist Party of Justice, and other 11,688 citizens. Among the reasons that file then the Supreme Court stated that to be instituted criminal proceedings for an offense related to the declaration of war without fulfilling the provisions of the Constitution is necessary that it be raised at the initiative of a quarter of members Congress and with the approval of the majority thereof. The SC concluded that the complaint did not provide data other than what has already been resolved "and" not one line dedicated to graduated. "Aznar only concern, not graduated, and only charge when the crimes listed Palace and graduated, "he concludes.